Here the key takeaways from the CMMC-AB’s February 2022 town hall.

In addition to the monthly CMMC-AB Town Hall, the Department of Defense (DoD) also held their own Town Hall in February.
The DoD Chief Information Security Officer (CISO), David McKeown, hosted the event. It provided insight into the role CMMC plays in a larger cybersecurity program for the defense industrial base (DIB).
As CMMC nears finalization, the strategic vision for improving DIB cybersecurity is more clear.
Yet, the logistics involved with setting up a scalable ecosystem remains the largest hurdle.
In 2013, the Presidential Policy Directive (PPD) 21 established the DIB as one of 16 critical infrastructure sectors.
The USD(P) (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy) is the DIB Sector Risk Management Agency (SRMA). It brings together resources from different departments within DoD. These resources include acquisition, engineering, cybersecurity, intelligence, security, etc.
As the CISO for the DIB, Mr. McKeown has identified four lines of focus for implementing cybersecurity in the DIB:

The DoD only knows the cybersecurity programs of around 1,500 companies in the DIB. That's out of the total 220,000 organizations.
DoD estimates that around 140,000 companies only have access to Federal Contract Information (FCI). That leaves around 80,000 companies that have access to controlled unclassified information (CUI). DoD still plans on completing CMMC rulemaking within the next 24 months. The CMMC contract language will be in all DoD contracts subsequent to rulemaking.
CMMC Level 1 is for organizations that only have FCI. DoD will not require them to obtain a third party assessment of their cybersecurity program.

Instead, DoD expects these organizations to…
CMMC Level 2 is for organizations that also have access to CUI. With the introduction of CMMC 2.0, DoD suggested bifurcating this group into those…
After additional review, DoD now believes that “probably all” will have to get a Level 2 assessment. This assessment has to come from Certified Third Party Assessor Organization (C3PAO).
CMMC Level 3 is for companies that have the most critical CUI. DoD estimates that around 500 to 600 companies will become certified at this level. The DIBCAC will conduct assessments for Level 3 based on controls from NIST SP 800-172.
The CMMC-AB previously stated that C3PAOs will conduct the NIST SP 800-171 assessments. These happen before an organization seeking certification (OSC) scheduling anything for Level 3.
Disseminating messages about worldwide threats to the DIB has been a challenge for the DoD CISO. Right now, DoD can only effectively reach DIB companies that have already partnered with the NSA and DC3.
CMMC should solve this problem. All DIB companies will register within a central system and provide their contact information.
The DoD has tasked the CMMC-AB with the logistics challenge of assessing these requirements in the DIB.
During the February Town Hall, the CMMC-AB provided a candid snapshot of the current ecosystem it is creating.

There has been significant progress over the past 12 months by the CMMC-AB. But, there is still a lot of work left before achieving the scale required to fulfill its mission.
DoD released updated assessment guides under CMMC 2.0 for Level 1 and Level 2. However, we continue to hear that the NIST SP 800-171 framework may soon have an updated version.
According to McKeown, the DoD is in discussions with NIST. The goal of these talks is to add practices and maturity model requirements removed under CMMC 2.0 into a new revision of SP 800-171.

Prior to starting any voluntary assessments, the CMMC-AB and DoD will publish the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP). The DoD has already reviewed an initial draft of this document. The CMMC-AB is in the process of adjudicating their responses.
The DoD Project Management Office (PMO) is still working on some policy guidance around…
But, CMMC-AB CEO Matt Travis expects publication of this document in the next couple of weeks.
Starting with the endpoint in mind, DoD expects all contracts post rulemaking to include CMMC requirements.
Rulemaking is still expected to take between 9 and 24 months from the announcement of CMMC 2.0 in November 2021. That roughly equates to a time between July 2022 and December 2023.

DIB entities awarded DoD contracts need a CMMC 2.0 certification post rulemaking. This is an accelerated timeline compared to the initial phased implementation.
The old approach would have gradually increased the number of contracts with CMMC requirements. In this model, eventually all contracts included this requirement in FY2026.
Let’s take a look at some of the early DoD assumptions. If there are roughly…
Those numbers would mean that roughly 18,000 DIB companies would need a Level 2 certification by the end of 2023.
Is the CMMC-AB capable of standing up an ecosystem to support that scale?
The CMMC-AB provided an interesting slide and discussion around what they have been able to accomplish over the past 12 months.
Registered Practitioners (RP) saw an increase of 83%. Meanwhile, the number of Registered Provider Organizations (RPO) has grown 58%.
However, when you filter to see only those active individual consultants listed on the Marketplace, we found 1,934 RPs and 494 RPOs.
The CMMC-AB showed that the number of Third Party Assessor Organizations (C3PAOs) had grown 9% from 433 to 474.
Again, the numbers listed in the marketplace were significantly different. It displayed only 202 C3PAOs pending a CMMC Level 2 Assessment, and 6 authorized.
It’s possible that the CMMC-AB has a backlog of organizations not yet in the marketplace. There’s also the potential that their figures include organizations with lapsed membership dues. Those organizations aren’t listed on the public marketplace.
According to the CMMC-AB, the number of Licensed Training Providers (LTPs) grew 126% from 34 to 77. We found this was closer to the number of 61 LTPs listed in the marketplace.
LTPs have been instrumental in growing the number of trained CMMC Professionals. But, since the exam isn’t yet available, we can’t call these individuals performing services “certified” yet.
The CMMC-AB lumped together any individual who had applied to become a Certified CMMC Professional (CCP) with a count of Provisional Assessors. They said that this group had grown 118% from 1,004 to 2,188. They also refined this count to say that of this group, 759 received training by February 2022 vs the 111 that had received training by February 2021.
The marketplace doesn’t include a category for CMMC professionals in training. But, they do list the number of provisional assessors.
Based on the known number of 146 provisional assessors, we can estimate that the LTPs have trained at least 613 CMMC professionals.

Using the CMMC-AB provided metrics, we can make some assessment capability assumptions.
Let's say 18,000 OSCs will need a Level 2 certification assessment. If that's the case, each of the 474 C3PAOs would need to complete 38 assessments.
That number certainly sounds attainable, but there are only 6 authorized C3PAOs listed in the Marketplace today. So, we have a long way to go before the assessing capability matches the capacity mentioned above.
A key part of the February CMMC-AB Town Hall was when Matt Travis discussed bifurcation rumors.
Matt’s perspective was that bifurcation was mostly a mechanism to manage capacity.

He explained that the day after rule-making, the ecosystem is likely not going to be big enough to accommodate every contract.
Matt also believes DoD still reserves the right to designate some Level 2 contracts for self-attestation. But, he does believe that it will be rare and reserved for a case by case basis.
It was encouraging to hear the strategic vision from the CISO at the DoD Town Hall meeting.
In the next coming months, DoD and the CMMC-AB should resolve the remaining tactical issues related to the CMMC Assessment Process. It’s also possible that voluntary assessments may begin.
Getting over 80,000 contractors and suppliers in the DIB to increase their cybersecurity practices comes at a critical time.
Securing critical infrastructure and protecting critical information is paramount to DoD’s mission. It helps deter war and protect the security of our nation.
In nec dictum adipiscing pharetra enim etiam scelerisque dolor purus ipsum egestas cursus vulputate arcu egestas ut eu sed mollis consectetur mattis pharetra curabitur et maecenas in mattis fames consectetur ipsum quis risus mauris aliquam ornare nisl purus at ipsum nulla accumsan consectetur vestibulum suspendisse aliquam condimentum scelerisque lacinia pellentesque vestibulum condimentum turpis ligula pharetra dictum sapien facilisis sapien at sagittis et cursus congue.
Convallis pellentesque ullamcorper sapien sed tristique fermentum proin amet quam tincidunt feugiat vitae neque quisque odio ut pellentesque ac mauris eget lectus. Pretium arcu turpis lacus sapien sit at eu sapien duis magna nunc nibh nam non ut nibh ultrices ultrices elementum egestas enim nisl sed cursus pellentesque sit dignissim enim euismod sit et convallis sed pelis viverra quam at nisl sit pharetra enim nisl nec vestibulum posuere in volutpat sed blandit neque risus.

Feugiat vitae neque quisque odio ut pellentesque ac mauris eget lectus. Pretium arcu turpis lacus sapien sit at eu sapien duis magna nunc nibh nam non ut nibh ultrices ultrices elementum egestas enim nisl sed cursus pellentesque sit dignissim enim euismod sit et convallis sed pelis viverra quam at nisl sit pharetra enim nisl nec vestibulum posuere in volutpat sed blandit neque risus.
Feugiat vitae neque quisque odio ut pellentesque ac mauris eget lectus. Pretium arcu turpis lacus sapien sit at eu sapien duis magna nunc nibh nam non ut nibh ultrices ultrices elementum egestas enim nisl sed cursus pellentesque sit dignissim enim euismod sit et convallis sed pelis viverra quam at nisl sit pharetra enim nisl nec vestibulum posuere in volutpat sed blandit neque risus.
Vel etiam vel amet aenean eget in habitasse nunc duis tellus sem turpis risus aliquam ac volutpat tellus eu faucibus ullamcorper.
Sed pretium id nibh id sit felis vitae volutpat volutpat adipiscing at sodales neque lectus mi phasellus commodo at elit suspendisse ornare faucibus lectus purus viverra in nec aliquet commodo et sed sed nisi tempor mi pellentesque arcu viverra pretium duis enim vulputate dignissim etiam ultrices vitae neque urna proin nibh diam turpis augue lacus.